PDA

View Full Version : 4/11/09 - Broadband Caps No Threat To Online Gaming Startups - businessinsider.com



Ed
04-11-2009, 01:50 PM
Article From: http://www.businessinsider.com/broadband-caps-no-threat-to-online-gaming-startups-2009-4

Broadband Caps No Threat To Online Gaming Startups
Eric Krangel|Apr. 11, 2009, 7:00 AM|

As Time Warner Cable (TWC) tests new new monthly bandwidth caps and overage charges on home Internet service, we wondered: Will new limits on Internet consumption throw a wrench in the works of gaming startups like OnLive, which promise to stream entire games in 720p hi-def to home TVs?

Nope, says OnLive founder Steve Perlman, in an interview with MTV.

Users will run into bandwidth caps on streaming video far before OnLive registers on anyone's radar. "It will be a very long time before OnLive comes anywhere near the broadband penetration of YouTube, Hulu, iTunes, Amazon, mtv, abc/nbc/cbs/fox/hbo.com, etc., if ever. So, we won’t be the ones testing this issue," Steve says.

Good point. And OnLive may eat less bandwidth than we thought. Steve says the service will consume about 350 MB per hour in play on a standard-def TV, or 950 MB per hour in hi-def. That's a fair bit less than the 2 GB per hour of Internet usage we estimated. (Though 950 MB per hour is still about $1 per hour in overage fees if you pass your cap.)

Both Microsoft (MSFT) and Sony (SNE) say they're not worried by bandwidth caps, but we never exepected them to be. Only services that stream entire games are heavy bandwidth consumers. Shooters like Halo 3 or Killzone 2 only have to exchange tiny packets of information -- like where players are on the map. World of Warcraft (ATVI), for instance, maxes out at an insignificant 30 MB per hour of bandwidth burn.

Alfrayer
04-11-2009, 03:11 PM
Great news! 950 MB is a pretty good limit, lets hope when they upgrade to 1080p it doesn't take much more =D

Tyrokiller
04-11-2009, 05:10 PM
Great news! 950 MB is a pretty good limit, lets hope when they upgrade to 1080p it doesn't take much more =D

Agreed when I was up last night I was trying to calculate what an hour would be and came to 2gig too, i.e. frames equal around 10KBPS (Compressed). Good to know that this could actually work.

Time to link to other forums, thanks again Admin for taking your time to find and get these interviews etc... up

AlexTheLion
04-11-2009, 06:21 PM
Wow this is great news...I was worried about isp caps, but now I feel way less anxious.

rasmasyean
04-11-2009, 09:56 PM
I doubt these bandwidth caps are going to make that much difference anyway. People have been paying "long distance" charges forever.

Bootstrap Bill
04-12-2009, 03:48 AM
There's always the possibility of getting a business account with your ISP. So far, they seem to be exempt from caps.

Diarrhea
08-23-2009, 01:16 AM
Great news even tough I'm a tad late on this.

I was wondering this as all ISP's here in Belgium have internet caps.

I have a standard internet connection and a 30 gb/month cap, which is pretty low compared to other local ISP who propose 100 gb cap, but I barely download at all, so same for me :)

Aph0ticShield
08-23-2009, 03:33 AM
Hmm, I never saw this article before. This is very good news, however, I kind of figured that this would be the usage. Based on how my ISP works, I could play for 1 hour in HD and another 2 hours in somewhere between SD and HD everyday. That isn't too shabby.

Diarrhea
08-23-2009, 06:49 PM
But one tought on this.
Is 350 mb the standard for any normal tv, no matter the size ?

See, my tv isn't Hd, but it's a 82 cm in diagonal, big-butt, tv.
So will my brandwidth consumption be capped at 350 mb/h or 950 mb ?

Clear cut, does standard tv screen size matter in the consumption ?

MAG1270
08-24-2009, 07:34 AM
No caps at my isp :3 So I'd prefer that OnLive would stream 1080p ^^